And I do say it, usually in interviews. If you taught writing, you know how to construct effective documentation.
References and Further Reading 1. Introduction African philosophy as a systematic study has a very short history.
This history is also a very dense one, since The ife matrix essay sought to do in a few decades what would have been better done in many centuries. As a result, they also did in later years what ought to have been done earlier and vice versa, thus making the early and the middle epochs overlap considerably.
The reason for this overtime endeavor is not far-fetched. Soon after colonialism, actors realized that Africa had been sucked into the global matrix unprepared. During colonial times, the identity of the African was European, his thought system, standard and even his perception of reality were structured by the colonial shadow which stood towering behind him.
It was easy for the African to position himself within these Western cultural appurtenances even though they had no real-time connection with his being. The vanity of this presupposition and the emptiness of colonial assurances manifested soon after the towering colonial shadow vanished.
Now, in the global matrix, it became shameful for the African to continue to identify himself within the European colonialist milieu. For one, he had just rejected colonialism and for another, the deposed European colonialist made it clear that the identity of the African was no longer covered and insured by the European medium.
So, actors realized suddenly that they had been disillusioned and had suffered severe self-deceit under colonial temper. It was the urgent, sudden need to contradict these European positions that led some post-colonial Africans in search of African identity.
So, to discover or rediscover African identity in order to initiate a non-colonial or original history for Africa in the global matrix and start a course of viable economic, political and social progress that is entirely African became one of the focal points of African philosophy.
However, it was George James, another concerned European who attempted a much more ambitious project in his work, Stolen Legacy. In this work, The ife matrix essay were strong suggestions not only that Africa has philosophy but that the so-called Western philosophy, the very bastion of European identity, was stolen from Africa.
This claim was intended to make the proud European colonialists feel indebted to the humiliated Africans, but it was unsuccessful. That Greek philosophy had roots in Egypt does not imply, as some Europeans claim, that Egyptians were dark nor that dark complexioned Africans had philosophy.
After these two Europeans, Africans began to attain maturation. It can be stated that much of these endeavors fall under the early period. For its concerns, the middle period of African philosophy is characterized by the great debate.
Those who seek to clarify and justify the position held in the early epoch and those who seek to criticize and deny the viability of such position entangled themselves in a great debate. Some of the actors on this front include, C.
The preceding epoch eventually gave way to the later period which has as its focus the construction of an African episteme. The former seek to build an African episteme untainted by ethnophilosophy; whereas, the latter seek to do the same by a delicate fusion of relevant ideals of the two camps.
In the end, Critical Reconstructionism ran into a brick wall when it became clear that whatever it produced cannot truly be called African philosophy if it is all Western without African marks. The mere claim that it would be African philosophy simply because it was produced by Africans Hountondji and Oruka would collapse like a house of cards under any argument.
For this great failure, the influence of Critical Reconstructionism in the later period whittled down and it was latter absorbed by its rival—Eclecticism. The works of the Eclectics heralded the emergence of the New Era in African philosophy.
The focus becomes the Conversational philosophizing, in which the production of philosophically rigorous and original African episteme better than what the Eclectics produced occupied the center stage.
The sum of what historians of African philosophy have done can be presented in the following two broad categorizations to wit; Pre-systematic Era and the Systematic era. This latter category could further be delineated into four periods: Early period s - s Later period s - s New Contemporary Era since s Note, of course, that this does not commit us to saying that, before the early period, people in Africa never philosophized—they did.
But one fact that must not be denied is that they did not document their thoughts and, as such, scholars cannot attest to their systematicity or sources. In other words, what this periodization shows is that African philosophy as a system first began in the late s.
Because there are credible objections among African philosophers with regards to the inclusion of it in the historical chart of African philosophy, the Egyptian question will be ignored for now.
The main objection is that even if the philosophers of stolen legacy were able to prove a connection between Greece and Egypt, they could not prove in concrete terms that Egyptians were dark complexioned Africans or that dark complexioned Africans were Egyptians.
It is understandable the frustration and desperation that motivated such ambitious effort in the ugly colonial era which was captured above, but any reasonable person, judging by the responses of time and events in the last few decades knows it was high time Africans abandoned that unproven legacy and let go of that, now helpless propaganda.
If however, some would want to retain it as part of African philosophy, it would carefully fall within the pre-literate or the pre-systematic era. In this essay, discussion will focus on the history of systematic or literate African philosophy touching prominently on the criteria, schools, movements and periods in African philosophy.
As much as the philosophers of a given era may disagree, they are inevitably united by the problem of their epoch. That is to say, it is orthodoxy that each epoch is defined by a common focus or problem.SPACE MATRIX: The SPACE matrix shows a borderline plot in the AGGRESSIVE quadrant, which correlates with the result from the IE matrix as well.
The plot ensure the company’s strong financial position (FS+5) with a great competitive advantage (CA). 1 Then Joseph could not refrain himself before all them that stood by him; and he cried, Cause every man to go out from me.
And there stood no man with him, while Joseph made himself known unto his brethren. Acts 2 And he wept aloud: and the Egyptians and the house of Pharaoh heard. 3 And. The EFE matrix is very similar to the IFE matrix.
The major difference between the EFE matrix and the IFE matrix is the type of factors that are included in the model.
While the IFE matrix deals with internal factors, the EFE matrix is . Develop both an external factor evaluation (EFE) matrix and an internal factor evaluation (IFE) matrix for a chosen organization, and write an analysis of the pros and cons and applications for use of each of these analytical tools.
An EFE matrix summarizes the results of an external audit. Gaming articles, stories, news and information. And SpaceX fans should circle their calendars for January 7th. The IFE matrix is a summary step in conducting an internal strategic management audit of the PepsiCo.
This strategies-formulated tool is to summarize and evaluates the major strengths and weaknesses in the functional areas of business.